apeks.tech
News · Regulation & Compliance 10 July 2026 · 1 min read

The SIRE 2.0 reality: vetting is now a digital workflow, not one-off preparation

SIRE 2.0 transforms tanker vetting into continuous digital workflow with algorithm-driven inspections and vessel-specific questions.

Editorial Team Updated 15 July 2026

Bu haberin Türkçesi →

IMPACT SNAPSHOT

TECH & OPS LENSonboard · office

~100 vessel-specific questions, human-factor scoring, a mandatory standard photo set every six months — vetting has become a continuous workflow

Systematic digital photo capture and archiving across the fleet is now a requirement

Who is affected
TankerSIRE 2.0WorldwideTechnical department, vetting coordinators, ship crews (tankers)
What to do
Put the six-month photo-set refresh on the calendar; share the scope of the question library with your crewsThe habit of one-off inspection preparation — because no two inspections are alike, the risk of being caught unprepared

OCIMF’s tanker vetting standard SIRE 2.0 has replaced VIQ7 since September 2024 and, in 2026, has become the central discipline on operators’ agenda. Inspections are now algorithm-driven: the question library generates around 100 vessel-specific questions for each ship, so no two inspections are alike; the human factor (crew competence) is scored alongside hardware and procedures.

The programme requires standard vessel photographs — covering safety-critical equipment, cargo areas, accommodation and engine rooms — to be refreshed every six months. Systematic digital capture and archiving across the fleet is no longer a choice; it is a requirement — the shift we break down in our SIRE 2.0 transition guide. Where the question is training rather than evidence, what SIRE 2.0 CBT can and cannot do covers it separately.

Apeks view — The era of “we’ll prepare two weeks before the inspection” is over. The real message of SIRE 2.0 is this: a vessel’s inspection evidence must be kept in order and ready to show at any moment, not reconstructed from scattered folders under deadline. For owners and technical managers the practical move is to make that evidence discipline a routine, not a one-off project — it is the need we are building HullSnap to serve.

Spot an error? Request a correction

Apeks Tech Editorial Team

Sourced curation

The Apeks Tech editorial team — sourced briefs and engineering-led curation; sources are listed on every brief. Editorial policy →

Was this useful?

Forward this to a colleague

Should your DPA, technical superintendent or a fellow owner see this? Forwarding costs nothing.

Was this forwarded to you? Take your own copy → subscribe here.

Share LinkedIn X

Related reading

Apeks Brief

Free

Decision intelligence for the people who run ships: what changed, who is affected, what to do.

  • One email a week — the default; you can change it anytime.
  • The week's notable developments: a headline and one line on what changed.
  • Turkish or English. Unsubscribe in one click; your address is never shared.
From the latest issue 12 September 2026
  • RINA Reviews Silverstream's Energy Savings Methodology
  • IMO MSC 111: MASS Code, LRIT Access, Piracy Data Update
  • IMO Net-Zero Talks End With Key Issues Still Unresolved
Read the full issue →

Free, with no paid tier. We send a confirmation link first — nothing arrives until you confirm.