apeks.tech
News · Regulation & Compliance 22 July 2026 · 3 min read

Paris MoU detention rate reaches 4.18% — but the longer view complicates the story

Paris MoU detention rate rises to 4.18% in 2025 from 4.03% in 2024, returning to 2022 levels.

Editorial Team Updated 3 September 2026

Bu haberin Türkçesi →

IMPACT SNAPSHOT

OWNER LENSmoney · risk

Tutulma, gemiyi seferden alıkoyar; bölgesel oranın yönü hedefleme sistemlerinin sıkılığına dair sinyal taşır.

Erişim reddi sayısı 19'a çıktı — birkaç yıllık düşük seyrin ardından yükseliş.

Who is affected
PSCWorldwideMediterranean

The Paris MoU has published its 2025 annual report, “Port State Control; Progress and performance, highlights of the Paris MoU 2025”. The headline figure is a detention rate of 4.18%, up from 4.03% in 2024.

That reads as a clean upward trend, and much of the trade coverage has framed it that way. The report itself is more careful: it also records a detention rate of 4.25% for 2022. On that longer view, the last two years look less like a new peak and more like a return toward a level the region has seen before. The direction is real; the novelty is not.

The report also records 19 refusals-of-access — bans — in 2025, described as a rise following several years of relatively low figures. A ban sits at the far end of the port state control ladder and follows the ship and its operator well beyond the port where it was imposed.

On deficiencies, the distribution is unambiguous. According to the Paris MoU’s 2025 report, fire safety under SOLAS Chapter II-2 accounts for the largest share at 16.8% of recorded deficiencies, followed by structural and electrical elements under Chapter II-1 at 11.6%, and health protection, medical care and welfare under MLC Title IV at 10.0%. Fire doors alone account for 3.1%. ISM-related deficiencies stand at 4.5%, and seafarers’ employment agreements at 1.3%.

Classification societies have been revising their own fire safety guidance in the same period. ClassNK issued Edition 2.0 of its container ship firefighting guidelines in July 2026, updating equipment specifications and monitoring measures for container carriers — the segment where fire risk has drawn particular regulatory attention in recent years.

The fire safety figure is worth pausing on, because an independent analysis published by RightShip in July 2026 reports the same 16.8% share for the Paris MoU region. Two separately compiled datasets agreeing on the same number is unusual enough to be worth noting — and it removes the usual excuse that the pattern is an artefact of one regime’s recording habits.

RightShip’s own inspection regime adds a second, separate route to the same fleet-risk exposure this report describes. Independent of PSC history, a vessel that reaches RightShip’s inspection age trigger — stepping down from 14 years to 10 across four phases — without a valid RightShip inspection on file has its Safety Score downgraded. Owners tracking a vessel against that phased schedule can check the exact dates with our free RightShip inspection age trigger checker.

For owners and technical managers the practical content is in the second and third lines of that list rather than the first. Fire safety is a known and heavily inspected area. Structural and electrical condition at 11.6%, and crew health and welfare provisions at 10.0%, are the categories where a deficiency usually reflects something that drifted over months rather than something that failed on the day.

Further detail sits in the full report, published 1 July 2026 on the Paris MoU publications page.

Apeks view — A single-year detention rate is a weak instrument; the same report showing 4.25% in 2022 is the reminder. What holds steady across the years is the deficiency mix, and that is the part an operator can act on. Two of the three largest categories describe slow deterioration rather than sudden failure, which puts the burden on how consistently a vessel’s condition is recorded between inspections.

Spot an error? Request a correction

Apeks Tech Editorial Team

Sourced curation

The Apeks Tech editorial team — sourced briefs and engineering-led curation; sources are listed on every brief. Editorial policy →

Was this useful?

Forward this to a colleague

Should your DPA, technical superintendent or a fellow owner see this? Forwarding costs nothing.

Was this forwarded to you? Take your own copy → subscribe here.

Share LinkedIn X

Related reading

Apeks Brief

Free

Decision intelligence for the people who run ships: what changed, who is affected, what to do.

  • One email a week — the default; you can change it anytime.
  • The week's notable developments: a headline and one line on what changed.
  • Turkish or English. Unsubscribe in one click; your address is never shared.
From the latest issue 12 September 2026
  • RINA Reviews Silverstream's Energy Savings Methodology
  • IMO MSC 111: MASS Code, LRIT Access, Piracy Data Update
  • IMO Net-Zero Talks End With Key Issues Still Unresolved
Read the full issue →

Free, with no paid tier. We send a confirmation link first — nothing arrives until you confirm.